
The best Lunatask alternatives are TickTick for tasks and habits, Todoist for organized project lists, Amazing Marvin for customizable personal planning, and SelfManager for dated work with supporting context and AI review.
None should be treated as a complete replacement for everything Lunatask offers.
Lunatask combines task management with notes, habits, journaling, personal tracking, and encrypted content. Before switching, decide which parts you actually want to replace.
If encryption and private journaling are central to your choice, staying with Lunatask may make more sense than moving to a planner with a different purpose.
| App | Best reason to consider it | Planning approach | Published pricing | Main trade-off |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SelfManager | Keep dated work, supporting material, and AI reviews together | Date-based tables with tasks, notes, comments, files, and time records | Individual $8/month or $72/year; Team $30/month or $300/year | No calendar sync; not a replacement for Lunatask's encrypted personal tracking |
| TickTick | Combine task lists, habits, and focus sessions | Lists, calendar views, habit tracking, and Pomodoro | Free; Premium $49.99/year | Does not reproduce Lunatask's whole personal tracking system |
| Todoist | Organize several projects around a clear daily queue | Projects, subtasks, recurring dates, priorities, and filters | Free; Pro $7/month or $60/year | Not a dedicated journal or mood tracker |
| Amazing Marvin | Choose how your personal planning system behaves | Configurable views, daily planning, focus tools, and time tracking | $96/year, equivalent to $8/month | Requires decisions about which features to enable |
Prices and published features checked October 16, 2026. Annual plans are paid yearly. Taxes, currencies, and app-store prices may vary.
This comparison is based on published product information. The suggested trials below are practical ways to evaluate fit with your own work.
Lunatask is more than a to-do list with a notes field.
It combines tasks, habits, notebooks, journaling, mood tracking, and personal relationship information. Its task tools include recurring work, time estimates, timers, and ways to limit work in progress.
Its Free plan is a useful starting point. Premium currently costs $8/month or $72/year.
That means switching should solve a specific problem rather than simply add another feature.
For example:
Lunatask says the content you enter is encrypted on your device before cloud storage and synchronization. Its documentation also states that some metadata, including task status, priority, and assigned dates, is stored unencrypted.
That is a more specific claim than saying an app is private or uses secure connections.
Do not assume another task manager has equivalent protection because it advertises security or says it does not train AI on your data.
If encrypted personal content is essential, evaluate that requirement before comparing planning features.
SelfManager is worth considering when your main problem is keeping the story of your work together.
A task name may tell you what to do. It often leaves out the client brief, the decision from yesterday's call, the time already spent, and why the work changed.
SelfManager organizes work around dates and tables. You can keep tasks alongside notes, comments, and time records, then return to the day when the work happened.
Consider a consultant preparing a recommendation for a client.
The work might involve:
A useful record includes more than completion checkmarks. It explains what was decided and what remains unresolved.
SelfManager's date-based structure suits that workflow. Its AI planning and review features can help you work with the record rather than reconstruct it from memory.
SelfManager's current tables include Images, Audio, Docs, and Video sections.
You can choose supporting context for AI requests, including documents, images, and audio transcripts. Videos can be stored and played, but are not sent to the AI.
This creates a useful distinction: keeping evidence beside the work and having AI interpret it are separate capabilities.
For example, you might keep a PDF brief with the tasks and ask the AI to review it alongside the recorded progress. A screen recording remains available for you or a collaborator to watch.
Individual costs $8/month or $72/year, with 35 AI credits per week.
Team costs $30/month or $300/year, with unlimited free collaborators and 70 AI credits per week. Admins and members can use the Team owner's shared AI credits.
Docs and videos share 5 GB on Individual and 25 GB on Team. Adding video requires a paid or lifetime account on the table owner; the seven-day trial does not include video uploads.
SelfManager is not a substitute for Lunatask's encrypted journal and personal tracking. It also does not synchronize your calendar or automatically schedule work around meetings.
Try SelfManager if you want one dated record of an active project. Add the tasks and decisions, track the work, and review the result after a week.
TickTick is a useful candidate when the parts of Lunatask you use most are tasks and habits.
It combines task lists with recurring reminders, calendar views, habit tracking, and a Pomodoro timer.
That can suit someone who wants to plan a working day, maintain a few routines, and run focus sessions without opening several apps.
The attraction is the combination of practical tools.
For example:
That is a different emphasis from using a journal, mood log, and personal relationship tracker together.
If those personal tracking features are central to your Lunatask setup, moving the task list alone may leave you needing another app.
Start with one project and two habits.
Check whether you can:
Keep the setup small during the trial. You are evaluating whether the workflow helps, not how many features you can configure.
TickTick has a free version. Premium currently costs $49.99/year and expands capabilities including calendar views and task duration.
Its free tier has limits, including the number of habits. Check the current feature table against the routine you want to use.
Choose TickTick when combining tasks, habits, and focus tools would simplify your day. Stay with Lunatask if its wider personal tracking and encryption are the reason the system works for you.
Todoist is worth considering when you want a more focused task-management system.
Projects give work a home. Subtasks, recurring dates, priorities, and labels help you organize it. Dates and filters help bring selected work into view.
Descriptions, comments, and files can provide supporting context without turning every project into a document workspace.
Imagine you have three clients, household responsibilities, and a personal project.
You may want each area separated while keeping a clear view of what needs attention today.
A restrained setup could include:
Shared projects are available, while the Business plan adds a managed team workspace.
This makes Todoist relevant when collaboration becomes more important than keeping all your personal tracking in one app.
Create one private project and one shared project.
Ask a collaborator to find a task, leave a comment, and update the work.
Then check your own daily planning: can you select a realistic amount of work without repeatedly browsing every project?
Avoid rebuilding your entire system around labels and filters on the first day.
Todoist has a free Beginner plan with five personal projects. Pro costs $7/month or $60/year.
Pro adds features including calendar layout and task durations. Business has separate pricing for managed team use.
Choose Todoist for organized tasks and collaboration. It does not replace a dedicated mood tracker, personal relationship system, or encrypted journal.
Amazing Marvin is worth considering if you like structured personal planning but want more control over how it works.
Its tools include daily planning, time tracking, timers, and configurable views. You can enable features selectively rather than use every part of the app.
Examples include a focus mode that shows one task, a task jar that selects something to work on, and planning feedback about capacity.
Some people work well with one consistent planning method. Others need different ways to approach different kinds of work.
A detailed daily schedule might help with client delivery. A smaller focus view might help when the full list becomes distracting.
Marvin gives you room to experiment with those approaches.
The trade-off is that configuration becomes your responsibility.
Choose one problem to solve.
For example:
I spend too long choosing what to work on after finishing a task.
Enable only the features relevant to that problem. Test them for several working days before adding more.
If you keep changing the setup without making work easier, simplify it.
Marvin's current pricing page lists $96/year, equivalent to $8/month, with a fourteen-day trial and no permanent free plan.
Choose it when configuring your planning environment is useful to you.
If you want fewer decisions about the system itself, a more opinionated workflow may be easier to maintain. Do not assume Marvin replaces Lunatask's personal tracking or encryption simply because both address personal productivity.
A replacement decision is easier when you separate the jobs your current app performs.
Write down:
Mark each one as essential, occasional, or unused.
If you only use Lunatask's task list, replacing it may be straightforward.
If you actively use six connected parts of the app, a new task manager may replace only one or two. That can still be worthwhile, but account for the additional tools and maintenance.
Use real work, including something that goes wrong.
A useful test contains:
At the end of the week, ask:
Was it easier to decide, act, and recover context?
Then check what did not transfer naturally.
Do not assume imports preserve journal history, habit records, formatting, recurring rules, or relationships. Check current export and import options with a small sample first.
Keep access to the original records until you have verified what moved.
Choose TickTick if tasks, habits, and focus sessions cover most of your needs.
Choose Todoist if project organization and shared tasks are the main priority.
Choose Amazing Marvin if you want to configure your personal planning system.
Choose SelfManager if dated work, supporting material, time records, and AI review matter most.
Stay with Lunatask if its encrypted content and connected personal tracking are central to your routine.
The goal is to solve a recurring problem in your work. A longer feature list is not enough reason to move.
For a date-based approach, try SelfManager with one active project. Keep the decisions and tasks together, then use the week's record to choose the next steps.
TickTick and Todoist offer free versions. TickTick is worth testing for tasks and habits, while Todoist fits project lists and shared tasks. Neither should be assumed to reproduce Lunatask's complete personal tracking or encryption.
Both can help organize tasks and notes, but their emphasis differs. SelfManager centers work on dates, with supporting material, time tracking, and AI planning and review. Lunatask combines planning with encrypted personal content and life tracking.
TickTick is a practical candidate for habits alongside task lists and focus tools. Check its current free and paid limits. If you already use Lunatask's broader personal tracking, compare the whole routine before switching.
Do not assume so. Review the provider's current security documentation. Secure connections, encrypted storage, and end-to-end encrypted content describe different protections.
That depends on the current export format and the destination app's import support. Test a small sample and verify tasks, notes, dates, and recurring rules. Personal tracking records may need a separate archive.

Plan smarter, execute faster, achieve more
Create tasks in seconds, generate AI-powered plans, and review progress with intelligent summaries. Perfect for individuals and teams who want to stay organized without complexity.
Get started with your preferred account