
Amazing Marvin fits people who want to shape how their planning system works. Todoist fits people who want a consistent task structure with fast capture, projects, and less initial configuration.
Both can manage serious work. The choice is about how much planning flexibility helps you act, and how much becomes another thing to maintain.
Official features and published US prices were checked November 7, 2026. This is documentation-based analysis, not claimed hands-on testing. This comparison is published by SelfManager.ai.
| Decision | Amazing Marvin | Todoist |
|---|---|---|
| Starting structure | Configurable workflow with many optional features | Inbox, projects, Today, and Upcoming provide a consistent starting point |
| Customization | Turn features on or off to shape your method | Organize with projects, sections, labels, and filters |
| Daily planning | Dedicated day-planning approach within a configurable system | Select work through dates and task views; Pro adds calendar layout and durations |
| Recurrence | Repeat rules with generated task occurrences; recurring projects also documented | Recurring dates, including patterns based on scheduled or completion dates |
| Free option | Full-access 14-day trial; no ongoing free plan | Beginner plan with five personal projects |
| Paid personal option | $12/month or $96/year | Pro $7/month or $60/year |
Sources: Marvin help center, optional features, Marvin pricing, Todoist pricing, and recurring dates.
Annual prices are billed for the year. Store prices, currencies, taxes, and future terms can differ; inspect checkout before purchasing.
Marvin's feature catalog explains that most features are optional and customizable. That is valuable when you already know why you want a particular workflow. It also creates a temptation to configure every possible response to future problems.
Start with a small version of your method: capture work, choose today's actions, and review unfinished commitments. Add one feature only after you can name the difficulty it addresses.
Todoist gives you a more consistent base. You can still overbuild it with excessive projects and labels, but there are fewer decisions about which planning mechanisms to enable. Its feature help covers the core task and scheduling functions.
A useful setup test is to stop after entering ten real tasks. Can you immediately choose and start one? If you need another hour of configuration first, pause and ask whether the work or the tool is driving the setup.
Marvin's help center includes a My Day view and guides for scheduling tasks into days. This supports a deliberate distinction between the pool of work and the work selected for a day.
Todoist uses dates and its task views to bring planned work forward. Its Pro plan adds a calendar layout, task durations, and deadlines alongside its broader project capacity.
The daily choice is the same in either app: which actions fit alongside your fixed commitments? A task that must be delivered Friday may need work on Tuesday. Do not make Friday carry both the deadline and the entire effort.
Try this fictional example in your preferred app:
Outcome: Send revised proposal by Friday
Tuesday: Read client feedback and identify unresolved questions
Wednesday: Rewrite the scope and pricing sections
Thursday: Review against client request and prepare final file
Friday: Send after approval, or communicate the remaining blockerNotice which tool makes it easiest for you to preserve the final commitment while changing the working plan. Neither app can decide whether a client has accepted a revised delivery date.
Marvin describes recurring tasks as a repeat definition plus the actual task occurrences it creates. Its recurrence guide includes calendar-based and after-completion patterns, with options for creating occurrences ahead of time. It also documents recurring projects.
Todoist's recurring-date guide distinguishes scheduling based on the original date from scheduling based on completion. Its scheduler provides custom patterns and end conditions.
This matters more than whether both apps have a repeat icon. “Review invoices every Friday” and “replace a filter 30 days after I last replaced it” are different rules.
During your trial, complete a routine late, inspect the next date, and see what missed work looks like. A routine that creates clutter or silently moves in a way you misunderstand will need adjustment before you rely on it.
Marvin's paid plan includes unlimited tasks and projects, while Todoist's Beginner and Pro plans allow five and 300 personal projects respectively. Five projects may be ample when sections group related responsibilities; it can be restrictive if every course or client needs a separate project.
Marvin documents web, Mac, Windows, iOS, and Android access, plus a Linux desktop option. Todoist lists web, Windows, macOS, Linux, iOS, and Android downloads.
Use your main device and your smallest everyday screen during selection. Confirm that the views you build remain convenient when capturing a quick action away from your desk. Platform availability alone does not prove identical functionality or comfort.
Avoid running two complete systems indefinitely. Use a small, comparable set of work and keep any critical deadlines in your existing trusted place throughout the exercise.
Choose ten to fifteen representative tasks: a project with stages, a recurring responsibility, a small errand, and a waiting item. Write your three requirements before using either app. For example: quick phone capture, a calm daily shortlist, and easy recovery after a missed day.
Allow a bounded setup session, then stop redesigning. Capture real tasks, choose the day, complete work, and revise the plan. Note the moments where you hesitate or lose context.
Record evidence rather than an overall feeling:
| Question | Your observation |
|---|---|
| Could I capture a task where work arrived? | [Example] |
| Could I choose the next action quickly? | [Example] |
| Did missed work remain understandable? | [Example] |
| How much time went into maintaining the system? | [Rough record] |
| Which requirement remained unsatisfied? | [Specific gap] |
Repeat with similar work and the same requirements. Do not give one app a heavily customized setup and judge the other from an empty account. Calendar days may differ in workload, so treat the result as personal evidence rather than a controlled benchmark.
Choose Marvin if its configuration solves recurring problems and you can maintain it without continual tinkering. Choose Todoist if its structure keeps capture, planning, and follow-through straightforward. Prefer the cheaper option only after confirming that its required tier fits the workflow.
If your priority is dated work history with time and notes, consider SelfManager.ai's date-based approach. It is a different starting point from configuring Marvin or organizing Todoist projects. It is not a reason to add a third trial unless that requirement is central to your choice.
For a broader change of approach, see Amazing Marvin Alternatives. This direct comparison is for people who have already narrowed the decision to Marvin and Todoist.
Its official pricing documentation says no. The 14-day trial gives full access; continued task use requires a subscription. Contact the vendor about its documented student or affordability options if relevant.
Beginner is a useful start for task capture and projects. If your selection depends on paid calendar, duration, or deadline features, evaluate those on the relevant tier rather than assuming the free version includes them.

Plan smarter, execute faster, achieve more
Create tasks in seconds, generate AI-powered plans, and review progress with intelligent summaries. Perfect for individuals and teams who want to stay organized without complexity.
Get started with your preferred account